The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Just about agreement that GNG/NEVENT are satisfied. Also agreement that a merge discussion might be warranted, which can be raised in the usual fashion
(non-admin closure)Nosebagbear (
talk) 22:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Comments I read through the article, I am not sure how relevant this particular protect sits in with other protects. I am not sure if the title is helping or not. There were over 4,000 views of the article end of July, but now there doesn't appear to be much viewership now which suggests the article and topic really are not that big a deal. I am also going to disregard
WP:GNG, it's probably better to have an article
Protests during the Trump administration.
Govvy (
talk) 14:01, 23 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep since article passes GNG. Xoreaster's suggestion seems more appropriate than deletion.
Rab V (
talk) 08:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
gidonb (
talk) 06:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep minor protest, low-turnout for a national, protest in D.C. There have been so many
Protests against Donald Trump. Above-average number of arrests. Coverage probably scrapes by EVENT.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 16:53, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Just about agreement that GNG/NEVENT are satisfied. Also agreement that a merge discussion might be warranted, which can be raised in the usual fashion
(non-admin closure)Nosebagbear (
talk) 22:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Comments I read through the article, I am not sure how relevant this particular protect sits in with other protects. I am not sure if the title is helping or not. There were over 4,000 views of the article end of July, but now there doesn't appear to be much viewership now which suggests the article and topic really are not that big a deal. I am also going to disregard
WP:GNG, it's probably better to have an article
Protests during the Trump administration.
Govvy (
talk) 14:01, 23 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep since article passes GNG. Xoreaster's suggestion seems more appropriate than deletion.
Rab V (
talk) 08:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
gidonb (
talk) 06:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep minor protest, low-turnout for a national, protest in D.C. There have been so many
Protests against Donald Trump. Above-average number of arrests. Coverage probably scrapes by EVENT.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 16:53, 5 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.