- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 01:01, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Women’s Health Co-Op
- Women’s Health Co-Op (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This seems like a non-notable health organization or health campaign. If it is an organization, it seems to exist to promote its own health campaign.
Every source that I see about this campaign/organization seems published by those funded to manage the campaign. An author named "Wechsberg" founded the campaign, and authored most of the many sources cited in this article. Those sources were published as results reporting of their receiving grants, and are not third-party journalism.
The world is full of public health campaigns and I think in the case of this one, the campaign was given a name in grant applications but I see nothing remarkable about it as compared to any other public health intervention. I do not see how this meets WP:GNG because the sources available are published by the project's founder, and I do not see how this meets any other inclusion criteria. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:08, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Yup, promo page cited to its own people, no evidence of WP:N. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 00:00, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Â B E C K Y S A Y L E SÂ 04:55, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker talk 01:01, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Women’s Health Co-Op
- Women’s Health Co-Op (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This seems like a non-notable health organization or health campaign. If it is an organization, it seems to exist to promote its own health campaign.
Every source that I see about this campaign/organization seems published by those funded to manage the campaign. An author named "Wechsberg" founded the campaign, and authored most of the many sources cited in this article. Those sources were published as results reporting of their receiving grants, and are not third-party journalism.
The world is full of public health campaigns and I think in the case of this one, the campaign was given a name in grant applications but I see nothing remarkable about it as compared to any other public health intervention. I do not see how this meets WP:GNG because the sources available are published by the project's founder, and I do not see how this meets any other inclusion criteria. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:08, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Yup, promo page cited to its own people, no evidence of WP:N. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 00:00, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Â B E C K Y S A Y L E SÂ 04:55, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.