- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ミラ P 15:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Wolfgang Jilke
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Wolfgang Jilke ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not appear to be notable. Internet searches on Google, Google Books, and Google News+Archive reveals only one source not from the UN (and thus affiliated with the subject), a news article on Ynet. Multiple sources are generally required, especially since the subject appears to still be living. NightlyHelper ( talk) 17:23, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 17:34, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 17:34, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep meets #2 of WP:SOLDIER and is mentioned in various books for his role in UN peacekeeping operations. Mztourist ( talk) 05:34, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. As a general officer, clearly meets WP:SOLDIER. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 14:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Passes WP:SOLDIER; sources are available. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep as he appears to pass the WP:SOLDIER requirements. Ejgreen77 ( talk) 11:27, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ミラ P 15:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Wolfgang Jilke
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Wolfgang Jilke ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not appear to be notable. Internet searches on Google, Google Books, and Google News+Archive reveals only one source not from the UN (and thus affiliated with the subject), a news article on Ynet. Multiple sources are generally required, especially since the subject appears to still be living. NightlyHelper ( talk) 17:23, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 17:34, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 17:34, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep meets #2 of WP:SOLDIER and is mentioned in various books for his role in UN peacekeeping operations. Mztourist ( talk) 05:34, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. As a general officer, clearly meets WP:SOLDIER. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 14:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Passes WP:SOLDIER; sources are available. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep as he appears to pass the WP:SOLDIER requirements. Ejgreen77 ( talk) 11:27, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.