The result was No consensus to delete, which defaults to keep. The second half of the nomination, namely the article titled Janet Wolfe, could perhaps be merged/redirected to form one more comprehensive article, as Ms. Wolfe is perhaps only notable for this particular venture. A merge proposal may be in order, keeping both for now... Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:43, 3 May 2008 (UTC) reply
No notability asserted, likely author conflict of interest.
Paulbrock ( talk) 01:08, 25 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Notification added to Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Pharmacology Paulbrock ( talk) 01:14, 25 April 2008 (UTC) reply
— powerten10 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was No consensus to delete, which defaults to keep. The second half of the nomination, namely the article titled Janet Wolfe, could perhaps be merged/redirected to form one more comprehensive article, as Ms. Wolfe is perhaps only notable for this particular venture. A merge proposal may be in order, keeping both for now... Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:43, 3 May 2008 (UTC) reply
No notability asserted, likely author conflict of interest.
Paulbrock ( talk) 01:08, 25 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Notification added to Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Pharmacology Paulbrock ( talk) 01:14, 25 April 2008 (UTC) reply
— powerten10 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.