- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:44, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Wilkinson Mountain ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Short mountain that lacks sigcov and isn't distinguished in any way, failing WP:geoland and WP:gng, also per this and this precedent. Geschichte ( talk) 23:09, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Precedent is not a correct way to build an encyclopaedia. Notability is not a blanket. One has to look at each subject on its merits. Uncle G ( talk) 10:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:33, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:33, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary). -- Cewbot ( talk) 00:02, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 02:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 02:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Mass-produced Geoland failure. Notability is certainly not a blanket, so articles should be created with care individually from substantive sources, not en masse from passing mentions of place names. Reywas92 Talk 03:40, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I was unable to find any sourcing that helps this mountain meet WP:GNG. Missvain ( talk) 17:19, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:44, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Wilkinson Mountain ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Short mountain that lacks sigcov and isn't distinguished in any way, failing WP:geoland and WP:gng, also per this and this precedent. Geschichte ( talk) 23:09, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Precedent is not a correct way to build an encyclopaedia. Notability is not a blanket. One has to look at each subject on its merits. Uncle G ( talk) 10:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:33, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:33, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary). -- Cewbot ( talk) 00:02, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 02:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 02:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Mass-produced Geoland failure. Notability is certainly not a blanket, so articles should be created with care individually from substantive sources, not en masse from passing mentions of place names. Reywas92 Talk 03:40, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I was unable to find any sourcing that helps this mountain meet WP:GNG. Missvain ( talk) 17:19, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.