The result was no consensus to delete. Merge possible, but not really seeing a definitive consensus for that here. W.marsh 01:01, 6 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable. Although mentioned by the Associated Press, the site doesn't have multiple non-trivial sources. Interiot 21:50, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
"Archive.org isn't the only site trying to save the ever-changing Web. Wikipedia.com, which constantly regurgitates itself with user-inputted data, is now being watched by wikidumper.blogsot.com.
"Any information not truthful enough to make it into Wikipedia is probably dubious twice over, but Wikidumper helps provide some oversight to the editors of Wikipedia, who can take down an entry for any number of reasons." Gretnagod 00:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus to delete. Merge possible, but not really seeing a definitive consensus for that here. W.marsh 01:01, 6 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable. Although mentioned by the Associated Press, the site doesn't have multiple non-trivial sources. Interiot 21:50, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
"Archive.org isn't the only site trying to save the ever-changing Web. Wikipedia.com, which constantly regurgitates itself with user-inputted data, is now being watched by wikidumper.blogsot.com.
"Any information not truthful enough to make it into Wikipedia is probably dubious twice over, but Wikidumper helps provide some oversight to the editors of Wikipedia, who can take down an entry for any number of reasons." Gretnagod 00:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply