The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. While there are more "keep" !votes in number, only one gives a detailed reason for notability, and it has been refuted. Ultimately, the debate appears to have died owing to a lack of input. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Wiki Loves Folklore

Wiki Loves Folklore (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable event, Fails notability. Juggyevil ( talk) 08:09, 21 February 2022 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography and Internet. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 08:26, 21 February 2022 (UTC) reply
• This is another article of Wikimedia Foundation event like Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves Pride and Wiki Loves Earth etc. The article is currently a stub and can be improved further by any editor. Some useful links to improve the event article can be found below.

1. https://www.reddit.com/r/ireland/comments/smagy7/wikipedia_2022_photography_competition_is_open/
2. https://bhuntr.com/en/competitions/1gm2ueelheezqhprpk
3. https://wikilovesfolklore.wikidonne.org/
4. https://www.independent.com.mt/articles/2022-02-04/local-news/VCA-launches-cultural-programme-for-first-half-of-2022-6736240373
5. https://stayhappening.com/e/wiki-loves-folklore-E10IF034VMQ
6. https://allevents.in/mobile/amp-event.php?event_id=80001324712146
7. https://wikimedia.ie/programme/wiki-loves-folklore-2022/
8. https://www.ilmattino.it/AMP/societa/al_via_wiki_loves_folklore_italy_progetto_di_wikidonne_fotografia_scrittura-6478246.html
9. https://www.vca.gov.mt/en/events/wiki-loves-folklore
10. https://bhuntr.com/en/competitions/jeaqx7z01687bliu13
11. https://goallevents.com/e/uslw-feminism-and-folklore-workshop-E800022050607358
12. https://timebusinessnews.com/join-us-to-for-the-4th-edition-of-wiki-loves-folklore-as-we-celebrate-our-folk-culture/
13. https://americanfolkloresociety.org/call-for-submissions-wiki-loves-folklore-photo-contest/
14. https://futmax.org/2022/02/13/join-us-to-for-the-4th-edition-of-wiki-loves-folklore-as-we-celebrate-our-folk-culture/
15. https://www.vilaweb.cat/noticies/un-nou-llibre-de-gegants-de-jan-grau-i-carles-freixes-al-fes-ta-festa/amp/
16. https://americanfolkloresociety.org/cfp-wikipedia-writing-contest-on-feminism-and-folklore/
17. https://festafesta.cat/
18. https://diff.wikimedia.org/2022/02/03/join-us-to-for-the-4th-edition-of-wiki-loves-folklore-as-we-celebrate-our-folk-culture/
19. https://diff.wikimedia.org/2022/02/15/take-a-step-forward-to-bridge-the-gender-gap-by-contributing-to-feminism-and-folklore-2022/
20. https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/1489969580302872582?t=GnZ-D8amU6-TeBmx6eoTEw&s=19

-- ✝iѵɛɳ२२४० ^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 09:28, 21 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:19, 28 February 2022 (UTC) reply

• Keep, as the sources kindly listed by ✝iѵɛɳ२२४० should be more than enough to establish notability. Yitz ( talk) 12:39, 28 February 2022 (UTC) reply
• Keep because of Tiven's sources. However, I will caution others that most of those sources are either unreliable or primary, so they do not count towards notability. There are enough to meet GNG though. Toadspike ( talk) 21:53, 28 February 2022 (UTC) reply
• The only one of those twenty sources that could be said to provide significant coverage in an independent reliable source is this one, and that reads as if it is copied from a press release. Phil Bridger ( talk) 16:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC) reply
  • The above sources like reddit, wikimedia, twitter & others are not reliable, or half of them are just print copies of the same PR material. Juggyevil ( talk) 21:16, 1 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ASTIG️🙃 _{( ICE-T • ICE CUBE)} 12:45, 7 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Third relist: more source analysis, in depth in nature, would be beneficial here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC) reply

• Keep Notable Event passes WP:NEVENT. Inspect61 ( talk) 03:46, 17 March 2022 (UTC) reply

  Notable on the basis of significant coverage in which independent reliable sources? There's no need to list 20, WP:THREE will do. Phil Bridger ( talk) 10:19, 17 March 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.