The result was delete. Singu larity 19:42, 24 May 2008 (UTC) reply
This website appears to lack non-trivial coverage by independent third party publishers, failing WP:WEB and WP:N guidelines. It should also be noted that this article has been deleted twice as a result of two previous deletion debates, but has since been re-created despite the consensus of the community. coccyx bloccyx (toccyx) 19:38, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment You say 'keep based on available references.' Can you provide one single, reliable source, nontrivial reference? I ask because I don't think one exists. Your argument is therefore null. Quatloo ( talk) 00:48, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 19:42, 24 May 2008 (UTC) reply
This website appears to lack non-trivial coverage by independent third party publishers, failing WP:WEB and WP:N guidelines. It should also be noted that this article has been deleted twice as a result of two previous deletion debates, but has since been re-created despite the consensus of the community. coccyx bloccyx (toccyx) 19:38, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment You say 'keep based on available references.' Can you provide one single, reliable source, nontrivial reference? I ask because I don't think one exists. Your argument is therefore null. Quatloo ( talk) 00:48, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply