From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 23:57, 16 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Wiggins Hill (Missouri) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short mountain that lacks sigcov and isn't distinguished in any way, failing WP:geoland and WP:gng, also per this and this precedent. Geschichte ( talk) 23:09, 9 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:31, 10 May 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:31, 10 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Agree that notability is not a blanket, so it's unfortunate how many articles such as this there are from this creator. No newspapers.com hits, no indication this is a notable area of higher-than-average-elevation land. Reywas92 Talk 07:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 23:57, 16 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Wiggins Hill (Missouri) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short mountain that lacks sigcov and isn't distinguished in any way, failing WP:geoland and WP:gng, also per this and this precedent. Geschichte ( talk) 23:09, 9 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:31, 10 May 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:31, 10 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Agree that notability is not a blanket, so it's unfortunate how many articles such as this there are from this creator. No newspapers.com hits, no indication this is a notable area of higher-than-average-elevation land. Reywas92 Talk 07:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook