The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. Per my endorsement of the PROD, there is no evidence this place exists. The cited reference does not even mention such a place. No trace found outside the Wikipedia article and wiki mirrors. A long-standing hoax, but still a hoax.
• Gene93k (
talk)
05:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete The listed source does not support assertions in the article. The claim of population would need to be souraceable to the US census, which it is not. The mention of most people living in tents is highly suspect.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
05:30, 24 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete, no GNIS entry, not mentioned in article's only ref (even looking at archived versions from the time of the ref's access date), and a Google search is like a directory of low-quality Wikipedia scrapers. All signs point to hoax.
Antepenultimate (
talk)
13:10, 24 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. As the editor who prodded this article, my reasons were stated in the prod notice. There is no evidence this place ever existed. The only reason I didn't submit it to speedy deletion as a hoax was because it had sat there for 2 1/2 years. --
Donald Albury01:29, 29 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. Per my endorsement of the PROD, there is no evidence this place exists. The cited reference does not even mention such a place. No trace found outside the Wikipedia article and wiki mirrors. A long-standing hoax, but still a hoax.
• Gene93k (
talk)
05:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete The listed source does not support assertions in the article. The claim of population would need to be souraceable to the US census, which it is not. The mention of most people living in tents is highly suspect.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
05:30, 24 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete, no GNIS entry, not mentioned in article's only ref (even looking at archived versions from the time of the ref's access date), and a Google search is like a directory of low-quality Wikipedia scrapers. All signs point to hoax.
Antepenultimate (
talk)
13:10, 24 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. As the editor who prodded this article, my reasons were stated in the prod notice. There is no evidence this place ever existed. The only reason I didn't submit it to speedy deletion as a hoax was because it had sat there for 2 1/2 years. --
Donald Albury01:29, 29 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.