- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ... Without prejudice to recreation if/when the "it will" becomes "it has." -- Euryalus ( talk) 06:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
WiO
- WiO ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability not established. The coverage is all "pre-market"-type "this is what it might do" material from 2011. Nothing else is immediately apparent, and they're not unique in the market. Available sources are very "press release"-like in nature, like announcing partnerships, etc. I was unable to find anything that establishes that it even has a market share. MSJapan ( talk) 02:51, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and I still concur with my PROD, nothing confidently convincing. SwisterTwister talk 03:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. No adequate sources. Corporate flam. Why are such articles allowed to be created? Xxanthippe ( talk) 06:08, 1 July 2016 (UTC).
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ... Without prejudice to recreation if/when the "it will" becomes "it has." -- Euryalus ( talk) 06:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
WiO
- WiO ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability not established. The coverage is all "pre-market"-type "this is what it might do" material from 2011. Nothing else is immediately apparent, and they're not unique in the market. Available sources are very "press release"-like in nature, like announcing partnerships, etc. I was unable to find anything that establishes that it even has a market share. MSJapan ( talk) 02:51, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and I still concur with my PROD, nothing confidently convincing. SwisterTwister talk 03:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. No adequate sources. Corporate flam. Why are such articles allowed to be created? Xxanthippe ( talk) 06:08, 1 July 2016 (UTC).
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 09:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.