- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:31, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Whova
- Whova ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to meet WP:Notability. A look at the history of this article shows that it was nominated once before for the same reason via WP:PROD. That time, the article creator (who appears very closely affiliated with the subject) removed the PROD tag, which is not a problem. I have notified creator as a courtesy. Article has too many issues to be worth saving. TritonsRising (talk) 21:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)| lambast 00:04, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty ( talk) 13:16, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. As written the article is borderline spam. I couldn't find any independent coverage outside of directory listings and the occasional conference using the app, though this is something that ought to attract easily google-able commentary. Receiving an SBIR grant is not a sign of notability. Opabinia regalis ( talk) 23:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:31, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Whova
- Whova ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to meet WP:Notability. A look at the history of this article shows that it was nominated once before for the same reason via WP:PROD. That time, the article creator (who appears very closely affiliated with the subject) removed the PROD tag, which is not a problem. I have notified creator as a courtesy. Article has too many issues to be worth saving. TritonsRising (talk) 21:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)| lambast 00:04, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty ( talk) 13:16, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. As written the article is borderline spam. I couldn't find any independent coverage outside of directory listings and the occasional conference using the app, though this is something that ought to attract easily google-able commentary. Receiving an SBIR grant is not a sign of notability. Opabinia regalis ( talk) 23:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.