The result was keep, as consensus seems to show that after revamp of article, notability is now asserted. - Patstuart talk| edits 19:41, 25 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Relisting from long and unusually confusing previous nomination for deletion. Participants in the previous one are welcome to participate here, but please, be more brief. Procedural renomination, no opinion from me. AnonEMouse (squeak) 17:26, 20 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep, as consensus seems to show that after revamp of article, notability is now asserted. - Patstuart talk| edits 19:41, 25 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Relisting from long and unusually confusing previous nomination for deletion. Participants in the previous one are welcome to participate here, but please, be more brief. Procedural renomination, no opinion from me. AnonEMouse (squeak) 17:26, 20 December 2006 (UTC) reply