![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2010 May 21. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was Delete. No reliable sources with serious coverage of wet paint signs have been found or given. Some cursory remarks about "if people see a wet paint sign, they will touch the paint", and that's all. Sources like Urban Dictionary or self-published books (AuthorHouse) are not helping. After two years, two AfDs and a rescue effort, it has become quite obvious that not enough good sources exist to write an acceptable article about this subject. Fram ( talk) 07:59, 20 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete. Non-notable. -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 10:01, 12 May 2010 (UTC) reply
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2010 May 21. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was Delete. No reliable sources with serious coverage of wet paint signs have been found or given. Some cursory remarks about "if people see a wet paint sign, they will touch the paint", and that's all. Sources like Urban Dictionary or self-published books (AuthorHouse) are not helping. After two years, two AfDs and a rescue effort, it has become quite obvious that not enough good sources exist to write an acceptable article about this subject. Fram ( talk) 07:59, 20 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete. Non-notable. -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 10:01, 12 May 2010 (UTC) reply