- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:48, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Westfield Bank
- Westfield Bank ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another article created by indef blocked editor user:BiH, many of whose paid creations have been deleted or are currently under AfD. The sources are all primary; no other reliable, independent sources found. Small bank, with only 150 employees, without better sources it fails notability per WP:ORG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:49, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NCORP. As another editor said in a related AfD. A promotional article by a paid editor is an advertisement. Advertisements are not appropriate for Wikipedia and should be deleted. Jbh Talk 02:10, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... ( talk) 12:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... ( talk) 12:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Does not meet wp:corp. This must have been an article "in progress" when BiH was blocked because the references themselves are stubs. No idea whether there were live references that could have filled these in, but I don't find anything. LaMona ( talk) 16:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:48, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Westfield Bank
- Westfield Bank ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another article created by indef blocked editor user:BiH, many of whose paid creations have been deleted or are currently under AfD. The sources are all primary; no other reliable, independent sources found. Small bank, with only 150 employees, without better sources it fails notability per WP:ORG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:49, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NCORP. As another editor said in a related AfD. A promotional article by a paid editor is an advertisement. Advertisements are not appropriate for Wikipedia and should be deleted. Jbh Talk 02:10, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... ( talk) 12:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... ( talk) 12:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Does not meet wp:corp. This must have been an article "in progress" when BiH was blocked because the references themselves are stubs. No idea whether there were live references that could have filled these in, but I don't find anything. LaMona ( talk) 16:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.