The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable organisation. The only news about the centre is about an arson attack, but the articles aren't about the centre itself
GDX420 (
talk)
17:37, 1 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - Hi
User:GDX420 I would appreciate it if you would cease targeting a number of articles I have created and falsely claiming I am a paid editor. I am raising your repeated targeting of articles I have written at
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:GDX420. Your proposal does not meet
WP:DP - the article is clearly in need of more detail, but it is sufficiently referenced, impartial, clear, and accurate to remain on Wikipedia. Thanks.
Llemiles (
talk)
17:52, 1 February 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable organisation. The only news about the centre is about an arson attack, but the articles aren't about the centre itself
GDX420 (
talk)
17:37, 1 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - Hi
User:GDX420 I would appreciate it if you would cease targeting a number of articles I have created and falsely claiming I am a paid editor. I am raising your repeated targeting of articles I have written at
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:GDX420. Your proposal does not meet
WP:DP - the article is clearly in need of more detail, but it is sufficiently referenced, impartial, clear, and accurate to remain on Wikipedia. Thanks.
Llemiles (
talk)
17:52, 1 February 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.