From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Rather than a 3rd relist with zero participation. WP:REFUND applies. ♠ PMC(talk) 13:34, 31 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Weekly Ajdad Islamabad

Weekly Ajdad Islamabad (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local newspaper with no notability found i.e. probably a newbie type. Fails WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 07:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala 08:36, 10 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala 08:36, 10 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 07:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bobherry Talk Edits 13:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Rather than a 3rd relist with zero participation. WP:REFUND applies. ♠ PMC(talk) 13:34, 31 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Weekly Ajdad Islamabad

Weekly Ajdad Islamabad (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local newspaper with no notability found i.e. probably a newbie type. Fails WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 07:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala 08:36, 10 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala 08:36, 10 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 07:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bobherry Talk Edits 13:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook