- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Webjet. The history is still intact so if anybody feels the need to merge something, they can. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:54, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Webjet Exclusives ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Failure to satisfy the various aspects of WP:NCORP. Plenty of mentions, a couple of pieces in non-reliable sources, but only reliable Sig Cov is on an action (Bit Coin usage) that doesn't actually tell us anything about the company. I suggest Redirect to Webjet Nosebagbear ( talk) 17:17, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- Merge to parent article, Webjet, per nom. There is also a discussion on the page's talk page, at Talk:Webjet_Exclusives#Proposed_merger. -- HunterM267 talk 17:25, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:57, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Business-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T)
22:58, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- At the risk of duplicating that discussion, I would argue that all the content of this article is within the history section (14/15) in Webjet, making an actual merge redundant (though an altered format would be justified). Nosebagbear ( talk) 23:21, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: The Webjet article contains sufficient coverage of this particular sub-brand in its appropriate context. Nothing suggests independent notability in its own right. AllyD ( talk) 14:15, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- Merge/Redirect to Webjet as per above. Jmertel23 ( talk) 14:49, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect to Webjet – preferably section Webjet#2014 or a new section to minimize confusion.— Alpha3031 ( t • c) 03:13, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. No need for a merge as already covered. Doctorhawkes ( talk) 03:01, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete is the best option as any searching will point to the parent article. HighKing ++ 20:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Webjet. The history is still intact so if anybody feels the need to merge something, they can. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:54, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Webjet Exclusives ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Failure to satisfy the various aspects of WP:NCORP. Plenty of mentions, a couple of pieces in non-reliable sources, but only reliable Sig Cov is on an action (Bit Coin usage) that doesn't actually tell us anything about the company. I suggest Redirect to Webjet Nosebagbear ( talk) 17:17, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- Merge to parent article, Webjet, per nom. There is also a discussion on the page's talk page, at Talk:Webjet_Exclusives#Proposed_merger. -- HunterM267 talk 17:25, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:57, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Business-related deletion discussions.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T)
22:58, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- At the risk of duplicating that discussion, I would argue that all the content of this article is within the history section (14/15) in Webjet, making an actual merge redundant (though an altered format would be justified). Nosebagbear ( talk) 23:21, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: The Webjet article contains sufficient coverage of this particular sub-brand in its appropriate context. Nothing suggests independent notability in its own right. AllyD ( talk) 14:15, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- Merge/Redirect to Webjet as per above. Jmertel23 ( talk) 14:49, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect to Webjet – preferably section Webjet#2014 or a new section to minimize confusion.— Alpha3031 ( t • c) 03:13, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. No need for a merge as already covered. Doctorhawkes ( talk) 03:01, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete is the best option as any searching will point to the parent article. HighKing ++ 20:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.