From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Weather Star. Think of this as the redirect equivalent of a WP:SOFTDELETE. (Sadly, SOFTREDIRECT is something else entirely.) j⚛e decker talk 02:33, 9 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Weather Star III (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Did not find significant independent reliable source coverage of topic to establish notability. Sources I did find:

  • "Audio Weather Alert Enhancement Release Notes: Weather Star Jr. and Weather Star III" (PDF). The Weather Channel. June 2004. [From The Weather Channel, seller of Weather Star III, so not an independent source.]
  • "99-339 10-26-2001 Mass Media Bureau: Waiver Order" (PDF). Federal Communications Commission. November 2, 2001. [Full text of FCC's 2001 waiver order on aural tone requirements for Weather Star III and Weather Star Jr computers.]
  • United States. Federal Communications Commission (2001). FCC Record: A Comprehensive Compilation of Decisions, Reports, Public Notices, and Other Documents of the Federal Communications Commission of the United States. The Federal Communications Commission. pp. 19784–19787. [Same FCC waiver order, in book form (snippet-view, not full text).]

Agyle ( talk) 21:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:36, 16 June 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Weather Star, any verifiable information can be, and I believe has been, added to that article. -- Bejnar ( talk) 11:34, 21 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 07:45, 23 June 2014 (UTC) reply


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey2010(talk) 15:51, 1 July 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Weather Star. Think of this as the redirect equivalent of a WP:SOFTDELETE. (Sadly, SOFTREDIRECT is something else entirely.) j⚛e decker talk 02:33, 9 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Weather Star III (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Did not find significant independent reliable source coverage of topic to establish notability. Sources I did find:

  • "Audio Weather Alert Enhancement Release Notes: Weather Star Jr. and Weather Star III" (PDF). The Weather Channel. June 2004. [From The Weather Channel, seller of Weather Star III, so not an independent source.]
  • "99-339 10-26-2001 Mass Media Bureau: Waiver Order" (PDF). Federal Communications Commission. November 2, 2001. [Full text of FCC's 2001 waiver order on aural tone requirements for Weather Star III and Weather Star Jr computers.]
  • United States. Federal Communications Commission (2001). FCC Record: A Comprehensive Compilation of Decisions, Reports, Public Notices, and Other Documents of the Federal Communications Commission of the United States. The Federal Communications Commission. pp. 19784–19787. [Same FCC waiver order, in book form (snippet-view, not full text).]

Agyle ( talk) 21:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:36, 16 June 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect to Weather Star, any verifiable information can be, and I believe has been, added to that article. -- Bejnar ( talk) 11:34, 21 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 07:45, 23 June 2014 (UTC) reply


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey2010(talk) 15:51, 1 July 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook