- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:14, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Warners Solicitors
- Warners Solicitors ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This firm does not seem notable to me. There is nothing in the article to suggest that it is. Tacyarg ( talk) 18:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. Wikipedia is not a platform for business listings. Fails WP:NOT and WP:SPIP. -- HighKing ++ 13:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - I can't find any media coverage suggesting any notability, beyond just being a normal law firm that has been around for a long time. There is an out of print book apparently about the firm [ [1]], but again, nothing that suggests the firm has done anything more than generate local interest. Fails WP:CORP. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 17:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:14, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Warners Solicitors
- Warners Solicitors ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This firm does not seem notable to me. There is nothing in the article to suggest that it is. Tacyarg ( talk) 18:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. Wikipedia is not a platform for business listings. Fails WP:NOT and WP:SPIP. -- HighKing ++ 13:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - I can't find any media coverage suggesting any notability, beyond just being a normal law firm that has been around for a long time. There is an out of print book apparently about the firm [ [1]], but again, nothing that suggests the firm has done anything more than generate local interest. Fails WP:CORP. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 17:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.