The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable aspect; sources are all passing or unreliable. Delete or merge. Deprodded for no valid reason. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?) 02:05, 3 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - the song has been discussed in relation to pop-culture studies (examples:
[1][2]) and frequently in the press about the show (examples:
[3][4]). The article could certainly be improved, but I can't agree it warrants deletion.
Nikkimaria (
talk) 04:56, 3 March 2015 (UTC)reply
purr, purr, purr
Keep The nomination allows that merger would be reasonable and so, per
WP:ATD and
WP:BEFORE, we shouldn't even be here. The fact that the original nursery rhyme was called "
Warm Kitty" rather than "
Soft Kitty" and that the original author was Edith Newlin seem to be quite important facts which the world wants to know. The page gets about 10,000 hits per month which is the high level of traffic of the topics being chosen for the
Core Contest. The
National Library of Australia source which verifies this is a good one as it would be otherwise quite hard to find. And it is easy to find more secondary coverage in works such as The Rhetorical Power of Popular Culture.
Andrew D. (
talk) 08:17, 3 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep: Notability of the song extends far beyond the Big Bang Theory. pbp 14:38, 7 March 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable aspect; sources are all passing or unreliable. Delete or merge. Deprodded for no valid reason. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?) 02:05, 3 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - the song has been discussed in relation to pop-culture studies (examples:
[1][2]) and frequently in the press about the show (examples:
[3][4]). The article could certainly be improved, but I can't agree it warrants deletion.
Nikkimaria (
talk) 04:56, 3 March 2015 (UTC)reply
purr, purr, purr
Keep The nomination allows that merger would be reasonable and so, per
WP:ATD and
WP:BEFORE, we shouldn't even be here. The fact that the original nursery rhyme was called "
Warm Kitty" rather than "
Soft Kitty" and that the original author was Edith Newlin seem to be quite important facts which the world wants to know. The page gets about 10,000 hits per month which is the high level of traffic of the topics being chosen for the
Core Contest. The
National Library of Australia source which verifies this is a good one as it would be otherwise quite hard to find. And it is easy to find more secondary coverage in works such as The Rhetorical Power of Popular Culture.
Andrew D. (
talk) 08:17, 3 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep: Notability of the song extends far beyond the Big Bang Theory. pbp 14:38, 7 March 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.