The result was redirect to Japanophile. – Juliancolton | Talk 13:40, 18 June 2009 (UTC) reply
The article violates Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not as it is merely a dictionary entry. The proposed deletion template was removed by an editor who at the time thought that the article held content that was better than that of the existing Wiktionary entry and therefore should be transwikied. Because after several weeks the article is still here and because I disagreed with the transwikification in the first place, I am now nominating it for deletion. Good raise 20:46, 3 June 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Japanophile. – Juliancolton | Talk 13:40, 18 June 2009 (UTC) reply
The article violates Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not as it is merely a dictionary entry. The proposed deletion template was removed by an editor who at the time thought that the article held content that was better than that of the existing Wiktionary entry and therefore should be transwikied. Because after several weeks the article is still here and because I disagreed with the transwikification in the first place, I am now nominating it for deletion. Good raise 20:46, 3 June 2009 (UTC) reply