![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2011 May 29. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 04:16, 29 May 2011 (UTC) reply
no reliable source (databases such as GEOnet do not qualify), no Chinese, no pushpin named "Wangtang" in the vicinity of the coordinates given. I do not have any tolerance towards articles like this that don't even give Chinese or a more specific administrative division. Nothing named "Wangtang" on this list for Lingchuan County, or for Yangshuo County, the two likely locations of this purported settlement. –HXL's Roundtable and Record 16:52, 21 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Also, the following have similar, if not the same issues, and I will amass evidence later, as I have to go to sleep:
This article about a populated place is based on one data source, namely the geographical coordinates servers at GEONet. While this populated place likely does exist and can be found on detailed maps, it is probably quite small, and may in reality be several km, or several tens of km, away from where the coordinates currently in the article indicate. You are welcome to improve the article by adding information from other cartographic and statistical.
One can probably train a bot to insert such a template into each stub article of this type. -- Vmenkov ( talk) 20:53, 23 May 2011 (UTC) reply
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2011 May 29. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 04:16, 29 May 2011 (UTC) reply
no reliable source (databases such as GEOnet do not qualify), no Chinese, no pushpin named "Wangtang" in the vicinity of the coordinates given. I do not have any tolerance towards articles like this that don't even give Chinese or a more specific administrative division. Nothing named "Wangtang" on this list for Lingchuan County, or for Yangshuo County, the two likely locations of this purported settlement. –HXL's Roundtable and Record 16:52, 21 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Also, the following have similar, if not the same issues, and I will amass evidence later, as I have to go to sleep:
This article about a populated place is based on one data source, namely the geographical coordinates servers at GEONet. While this populated place likely does exist and can be found on detailed maps, it is probably quite small, and may in reality be several km, or several tens of km, away from where the coordinates currently in the article indicate. You are welcome to improve the article by adding information from other cartographic and statistical.
One can probably train a bot to insert such a template into each stub article of this type. -- Vmenkov ( talk) 20:53, 23 May 2011 (UTC) reply