- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Disney Parks, Experiences and Products. Spartaz Humbug! 08:09, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not seem to pass WP:GNG, ongoing talk page discussion seems to conclude that this company's existence might be notable enough to be discussed elsewhere, such as on Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, but there's simply not enough information to justify having a full article about it. Nathan2055 talk - contribs 00:07, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disney-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs ( talk) 01:16, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Amusement parks-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs ( talk) 01:16, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: There's already an article addressing the larger segment of the company at Disney Parks, Experiences and Products. There are also individual articles on each of the two parks in the US, Disneyland Resort and Walt Disney World. Both those articles mention the Disney Parks, Experiences and Products division in the lead. It seems unnecessary and potentially confusing to have a separate article for this intermediate entity in the company's organizational structure. There don't seem to be any good arguments on the talk page for why this division of the company meets WP:GNG on its own. — Tartan357 ( Talk) 04:44, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Does not have much information about this unit at the article, which speculative. I cannot find any news articles on the company. Spshu ( talk) 17:50, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This is a massive business and there is extensive documentation about it at places like Dun & Bradstreet. Of course, it is part of the Walt Disney conglomerate but that's huge and has a complex structure covering a variety of businesses. The worst case would be some sort of merge/split restructuring but there's no case for deletion at all. See WP:ATD. Andrew🐉( talk) 22:17, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: I agree with Andrew Davidson. 2600:6C5A:47F:F9E5:E072:38C1:D05A:4835 ( talk) 19:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: I can't find any real independent sources (all I could find is business registries and building permits.) This subsidiary is part of Disney Parks, Experiences and Products - merging into that article might be a good idea. Many or even most large companies have operational subsidiaries that do not have their own Wikipedia articles. 2600:4040:5006:F700:C9FB:2BFD:D658:BF14 ( talk) 07:19, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: There is nothing to indicate why this subsidiary of
Disney Parks, Experiences and Products is in any way independently notable enough to need a spinout article. I was going to suggest a Redirect, but
Walt Disney Parks and Resorts already is one, and tacking on the U.S. at the end probably isn't going to be particularly helpful for a search. Still, Redirects are cheap, so I would not be particularly upset if someone wanted to make this into one.
Rorshacma (
talk)
23:33, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'd personally prefer to change it back to a redirect, since that's what it was prior to the stub being recreated: see Special:Diff/966012737. It should probably be targeted to Disney Parks, Experiences and Products instead of Walt Disney World, though, since that's the more relevant article to this company/title. Nathan2055 talk - contribs 23:55, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect To
Disney Parks, Experiences and Products But Keep Its Edit History: Lets keep it as a redict untill its either Confirmed, Opened, Or We Learn Alot More Information About It.
InspirePeople (
talk)
19:07, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- Wait Oops Wrong Thing Sorry. InspirePeople ( talk) 19:09, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect and merge To Disney Parks, Experiences and Products per above. But it needs to Keep Its Edit History 110.137.124.152 ( talk) 23:28, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect and Merge Not worthy of its own page. Put the suitable content on one of the many other Disney pages. MaskedSinger ( talk) 15:15, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Disney Parks, Experiences and Products. Spartaz Humbug! 08:09, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not seem to pass WP:GNG, ongoing talk page discussion seems to conclude that this company's existence might be notable enough to be discussed elsewhere, such as on Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, but there's simply not enough information to justify having a full article about it. Nathan2055 talk - contribs 00:07, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disney-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs ( talk) 01:16, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Amusement parks-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs ( talk) 01:16, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: There's already an article addressing the larger segment of the company at Disney Parks, Experiences and Products. There are also individual articles on each of the two parks in the US, Disneyland Resort and Walt Disney World. Both those articles mention the Disney Parks, Experiences and Products division in the lead. It seems unnecessary and potentially confusing to have a separate article for this intermediate entity in the company's organizational structure. There don't seem to be any good arguments on the talk page for why this division of the company meets WP:GNG on its own. — Tartan357 ( Talk) 04:44, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Does not have much information about this unit at the article, which speculative. I cannot find any news articles on the company. Spshu ( talk) 17:50, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This is a massive business and there is extensive documentation about it at places like Dun & Bradstreet. Of course, it is part of the Walt Disney conglomerate but that's huge and has a complex structure covering a variety of businesses. The worst case would be some sort of merge/split restructuring but there's no case for deletion at all. See WP:ATD. Andrew🐉( talk) 22:17, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: I agree with Andrew Davidson. 2600:6C5A:47F:F9E5:E072:38C1:D05A:4835 ( talk) 19:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: I can't find any real independent sources (all I could find is business registries and building permits.) This subsidiary is part of Disney Parks, Experiences and Products - merging into that article might be a good idea. Many or even most large companies have operational subsidiaries that do not have their own Wikipedia articles. 2600:4040:5006:F700:C9FB:2BFD:D658:BF14 ( talk) 07:19, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: There is nothing to indicate why this subsidiary of
Disney Parks, Experiences and Products is in any way independently notable enough to need a spinout article. I was going to suggest a Redirect, but
Walt Disney Parks and Resorts already is one, and tacking on the U.S. at the end probably isn't going to be particularly helpful for a search. Still, Redirects are cheap, so I would not be particularly upset if someone wanted to make this into one.
Rorshacma (
talk)
23:33, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'd personally prefer to change it back to a redirect, since that's what it was prior to the stub being recreated: see Special:Diff/966012737. It should probably be targeted to Disney Parks, Experiences and Products instead of Walt Disney World, though, since that's the more relevant article to this company/title. Nathan2055 talk - contribs 23:55, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect To
Disney Parks, Experiences and Products But Keep Its Edit History: Lets keep it as a redict untill its either Confirmed, Opened, Or We Learn Alot More Information About It.
InspirePeople (
talk)
19:07, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- Wait Oops Wrong Thing Sorry. InspirePeople ( talk) 19:09, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect and merge To Disney Parks, Experiences and Products per above. But it needs to Keep Its Edit History 110.137.124.152 ( talk) 23:28, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect and Merge Not worthy of its own page. Put the suitable content on one of the many other Disney pages. MaskedSinger ( talk) 15:15, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.