From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to R. Wallace & Sons. Clear consensus not to retain the article, but this was a very good ATD. Daniel ( talk) 03:55, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Wallace Silversmiths Inc.

Wallace Silversmiths Inc. (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only ref that is an independent reliable source appears to be about the brand being acquired as part of a larger deal, not in-depth coverage of the article subject. I didn't find much else in my own search. I'm not sure if this is a case of copyright violation or citeogenesis, but much of the content is nearly word-for-word from the company's own website. So, we've got the company's own words about itself, and one minor reference in a trade publication. This does not seem salvageable. Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

“One of the most noted factories in Connecticut which is devoted to the manufacture of silverware, and one which has in no small degree contributed to the development of the industry” The Jewelers' Circular and Horological Review - 7th February 1894 ( https://archive.org/details/jewelerscircular00unse_20/page/n49/mode/2up?q=Wallace) Bloger ( talk) 23:47, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply
All over the the Jewelers' Circular and Horological Review https://archive.org/details/jewelerscircular?query=Wallace&sin=TXT Bloger ( talk) 23:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply
I'm always willing to reconsider, but search results are not indicative of significant coverage. Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:06, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply
And there are 100+ more - Missvain ( talk) 20:00, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to R. Wallace & Sons. Clear consensus not to retain the article, but this was a very good ATD. Daniel ( talk) 03:55, 25 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Wallace Silversmiths Inc.

Wallace Silversmiths Inc. (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only ref that is an independent reliable source appears to be about the brand being acquired as part of a larger deal, not in-depth coverage of the article subject. I didn't find much else in my own search. I'm not sure if this is a case of copyright violation or citeogenesis, but much of the content is nearly word-for-word from the company's own website. So, we've got the company's own words about itself, and one minor reference in a trade publication. This does not seem salvageable. Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

“One of the most noted factories in Connecticut which is devoted to the manufacture of silverware, and one which has in no small degree contributed to the development of the industry” The Jewelers' Circular and Horological Review - 7th February 1894 ( https://archive.org/details/jewelerscircular00unse_20/page/n49/mode/2up?q=Wallace) Bloger ( talk) 23:47, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply
All over the the Jewelers' Circular and Horological Review https://archive.org/details/jewelerscircular?query=Wallace&sin=TXT Bloger ( talk) 23:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC) reply
I'm always willing to reconsider, but search results are not indicative of significant coverage. Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:06, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply
And there are 100+ more - Missvain ( talk) 20:00, 22 December 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook