The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I considered closing as redirect but really doesn't make sense as anyone searching for it would find
WWE Greatest Royal Rumble anyway J04n(
talk page) 14:52, 9 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The WWE Greatest Royal Rumble Trophy was awarded to Braun Strowman after he won the 50-men Royal Rumble match. Aren't you aware of the latest events going on? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Hamza Ahmad Wiki Scientist (
talk •
contribs) 15:19, 1 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Whilst it could at some point become something, right now it's as important as any kayfabe "match winnings". If the trophy had some press, or had some relevence, it would be a harder delete. Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs) 15:37, 1 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The trophy may not be important to you, but it is significant, and if this page is deleted, then someone else may create it again. I hope you can't put this deletion tag everywhere. And the
WWE Greatest Royal Rumble Championship page is even created by me.
User:Hamza Ahmad Wiki Scientist
@
Hamza Ahmad Wiki Scientist: I suggest you read wikipedia's guidelines for notability as you do not seem to have an understanding of them. - GalatzTalk 17:24, 1 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete The event in itself is notable. The trophy is not. The argument "someone else may create it again" doesn't hold any water, as if it is recreated, and doesn't address the reasoning for deletion, it will be deleted again. It's a kayfabe award for a one-off event, and doesn't hold any significance outside it.
The battle royale held every Wrestlemania has a trophy awarded to the winner. That trophy does not have it's own article, which is a very good sign that this itself is not notable enough to warrant inclusion.
RickinBaltimore (
talk) 17:29, 1 May 2018 (UTC)reply
To tag that thought, we actually just moved the article to the battle royal over the trophy because consensus was the match was notable and not the trophy itself. And also the article could always be
WP:SALTed to avoid recreation if there was an issue with recreation. I am not nominating the belt for now, I am undecided on it, because that is something that time will tell. If its carried around and used like a real belt then it has a case, but the trophy wont be, so to be this one is clear, the belt is too soon.
Hamza Ahmad Wiki Scientist you might also want to read
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and
WP:ILIKEIT in your free time. - GalatzTalk 17:34, 1 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete The WWE Greatest Royal Rumble event and the WWE Greatest Royal Rumble Championship sufficiently cover this topic . - ZSJUSA
Delete. Also, the
WWE Greatest Royal Rumble Championship is completely wrong in its treatment of the belt that was awarded. It is not a regular championship title at all. It is not listed as a current championship on the WWE website, and that's the definitive source, so I've already removed it from the navbox and list article. It's exactly like this trophy, in that it has absolutely no separate notability from the event.
oknazevad (
talk) 02:46, 2 May 2018 (UTC) PS NotTheFakeJTP and I had the exact same point at the exact same time.reply
Delete - the event was clearly notable. The trophy awarded to the winner has no independent notability --
ChrisTheDude (
talk) 09:39, 2 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - It's basically the Greatest Royal Rumble version of the Andre the Giant Memorial Trophy. And as for the notability,
WP:DOUBT. Also, don't flag things for deletion just because there is no notability (aka
WP:ZEALOUS). Hansen Sebastian 04:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Yet the consensus was the Andre the Giant Memorial Trophy was not notable, therefore your argument makes no sense. Also
WP:ZEALOUS is not an argument for lack for notability, that is why you delete things around here. - GalatzTalk 11:39, 6 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I considered closing as redirect but really doesn't make sense as anyone searching for it would find
WWE Greatest Royal Rumble anyway J04n(
talk page) 14:52, 9 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The WWE Greatest Royal Rumble Trophy was awarded to Braun Strowman after he won the 50-men Royal Rumble match. Aren't you aware of the latest events going on? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Hamza Ahmad Wiki Scientist (
talk •
contribs) 15:19, 1 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Whilst it could at some point become something, right now it's as important as any kayfabe "match winnings". If the trophy had some press, or had some relevence, it would be a harder delete. Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs) 15:37, 1 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The trophy may not be important to you, but it is significant, and if this page is deleted, then someone else may create it again. I hope you can't put this deletion tag everywhere. And the
WWE Greatest Royal Rumble Championship page is even created by me.
User:Hamza Ahmad Wiki Scientist
@
Hamza Ahmad Wiki Scientist: I suggest you read wikipedia's guidelines for notability as you do not seem to have an understanding of them. - GalatzTalk 17:24, 1 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete The event in itself is notable. The trophy is not. The argument "someone else may create it again" doesn't hold any water, as if it is recreated, and doesn't address the reasoning for deletion, it will be deleted again. It's a kayfabe award for a one-off event, and doesn't hold any significance outside it.
The battle royale held every Wrestlemania has a trophy awarded to the winner. That trophy does not have it's own article, which is a very good sign that this itself is not notable enough to warrant inclusion.
RickinBaltimore (
talk) 17:29, 1 May 2018 (UTC)reply
To tag that thought, we actually just moved the article to the battle royal over the trophy because consensus was the match was notable and not the trophy itself. And also the article could always be
WP:SALTed to avoid recreation if there was an issue with recreation. I am not nominating the belt for now, I am undecided on it, because that is something that time will tell. If its carried around and used like a real belt then it has a case, but the trophy wont be, so to be this one is clear, the belt is too soon.
Hamza Ahmad Wiki Scientist you might also want to read
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and
WP:ILIKEIT in your free time. - GalatzTalk 17:34, 1 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete The WWE Greatest Royal Rumble event and the WWE Greatest Royal Rumble Championship sufficiently cover this topic . - ZSJUSA
Delete. Also, the
WWE Greatest Royal Rumble Championship is completely wrong in its treatment of the belt that was awarded. It is not a regular championship title at all. It is not listed as a current championship on the WWE website, and that's the definitive source, so I've already removed it from the navbox and list article. It's exactly like this trophy, in that it has absolutely no separate notability from the event.
oknazevad (
talk) 02:46, 2 May 2018 (UTC) PS NotTheFakeJTP and I had the exact same point at the exact same time.reply
Delete - the event was clearly notable. The trophy awarded to the winner has no independent notability --
ChrisTheDude (
talk) 09:39, 2 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - It's basically the Greatest Royal Rumble version of the Andre the Giant Memorial Trophy. And as for the notability,
WP:DOUBT. Also, don't flag things for deletion just because there is no notability (aka
WP:ZEALOUS). Hansen Sebastian 04:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Yet the consensus was the Andre the Giant Memorial Trophy was not notable, therefore your argument makes no sense. Also
WP:ZEALOUS is not an argument for lack for notability, that is why you delete things around here. - GalatzTalk 11:39, 6 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.