- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 13:22, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- WWE: Uncaged VIII ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence this is notable. Slatersteven ( talk) 11:59, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- Page directly from iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/wwe-uncaged-viii/1463847704 Maxwell7985 ( talk) 14:22, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails WP:GNG. StaticVapor message me! 20:53, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- If it’s gonna be deleted, delete every Uncaged article, because it makes no sense to argue one shouldn’t be here and to keep the rest. It’s no less notable. 205.213.203.16 ( talk) 22:52, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- I agree that every Uncaged article should be deleted. They didn't chart on Billboard and were not covered in reliable sources. StaticVapor message me! 23:14, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- Other rubbish exists is not really a keep argument, it is rather a delete the other crap as well argument. The article must stand on its own merits. Slatersteven ( talk) 11:47, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- I have personally checked if Uncaged VIII is available on Spotify. I do agree, that if you plan on deleting Uncaged VIII, then you should delete all Uncaged pages. Because if you find this not notable, none of the Uncaged pages are notable. Kntx12 ( talk) 00:47, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. If Uncaged VIII is not notable, then neither are the previous Uncaged albums. Hansen Sebastian's 2nd account ( Leave me a message here) 11:55, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- @
Hansen Sebastian's 2nd: Your keep vote does not make much sense. Just because the other albums have articles, does not mean this one (or any of them) are notable or should have articles.
StaticVapor
message me!
18:24, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - Well, it kind of does. It contains notable songs from WWE that are unreleased for WWE The Music. Look at the album on Spotify. It doesn't need to be on the Billboard charts to make it notable. Hansen Sebastian's 2nd account ( Leave me a message here) 02:02, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- @ Hansen Sebastian's 2nd: Being on Spotify and containing unreleased songs does not make an album notable. See WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG. Those are the notability guidelines that apply in this AfD. StaticVapor message me! 04:12, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- @
Hansen Sebastian's 2nd: Your keep vote does not make much sense. Just because the other albums have articles, does not mean this one (or any of them) are notable or should have articles.
StaticVapor
message me!
18:24, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 11:38, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 11:38, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - I don't see any reliable sources on the net about this album. 111.68.115.165 ( talk) 02:41, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - per failing the WP:GNG. Its probably too late to bundle them in now, but a bunch of these WWE music albums could probably be bundled together in a future AFD too. Sergecross73 msg me 12:34, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete since subject fails WP:NALBUM and even WP:GNG. Once again, the argument that "other, similar stuff already exists in Wikipedia" is, per WP:OSE, not a valid one. - The Gnome ( talk) 11:04, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 13:22, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- WWE: Uncaged VIII ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence this is notable. Slatersteven ( talk) 11:59, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- Page directly from iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/wwe-uncaged-viii/1463847704 Maxwell7985 ( talk) 14:22, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails WP:GNG. StaticVapor message me! 20:53, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- If it’s gonna be deleted, delete every Uncaged article, because it makes no sense to argue one shouldn’t be here and to keep the rest. It’s no less notable. 205.213.203.16 ( talk) 22:52, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- I agree that every Uncaged article should be deleted. They didn't chart on Billboard and were not covered in reliable sources. StaticVapor message me! 23:14, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- Other rubbish exists is not really a keep argument, it is rather a delete the other crap as well argument. The article must stand on its own merits. Slatersteven ( talk) 11:47, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- I have personally checked if Uncaged VIII is available on Spotify. I do agree, that if you plan on deleting Uncaged VIII, then you should delete all Uncaged pages. Because if you find this not notable, none of the Uncaged pages are notable. Kntx12 ( talk) 00:47, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. If Uncaged VIII is not notable, then neither are the previous Uncaged albums. Hansen Sebastian's 2nd account ( Leave me a message here) 11:55, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- @
Hansen Sebastian's 2nd: Your keep vote does not make much sense. Just because the other albums have articles, does not mean this one (or any of them) are notable or should have articles.
StaticVapor
message me!
18:24, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - Well, it kind of does. It contains notable songs from WWE that are unreleased for WWE The Music. Look at the album on Spotify. It doesn't need to be on the Billboard charts to make it notable. Hansen Sebastian's 2nd account ( Leave me a message here) 02:02, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- @ Hansen Sebastian's 2nd: Being on Spotify and containing unreleased songs does not make an album notable. See WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG. Those are the notability guidelines that apply in this AfD. StaticVapor message me! 04:12, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- @
Hansen Sebastian's 2nd: Your keep vote does not make much sense. Just because the other albums have articles, does not mean this one (or any of them) are notable or should have articles.
StaticVapor
message me!
18:24, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 11:38, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 11:38, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - I don't see any reliable sources on the net about this album. 111.68.115.165 ( talk) 02:41, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - per failing the WP:GNG. Its probably too late to bundle them in now, but a bunch of these WWE music albums could probably be bundled together in a future AFD too. Sergecross73 msg me 12:34, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete since subject fails WP:NALBUM and even WP:GNG. Once again, the argument that "other, similar stuff already exists in Wikipedia" is, per WP:OSE, not a valid one. - The Gnome ( talk) 11:04, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.