The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. I have added 3 independent citations, and consider that notability is now demonstrated. I have therefore removed the Notability banner, as well as Advert which IMHO is no longer required either. –
FayenaticLondon12:35, 2 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Weak Keep, covering in
Baptist Press might be considered reliable and substantial enough to push this over the
WP:GNG. Not sure about the credibility of "Christian Computing Magazine". Some of the sources are blogs and need to be looked at carefully.
Lankiveil(
speak to me)12:05, 14 January 2014 (UTC).reply
Keep. 1) Christian Computing Magazine has existed in print and online since 1989. It has been one of the main sources of news about the software industry serving Christian churches, primarily evangelical and U.S. 2) Preaching Magazine has existed in print and online for over 20 years serving the audience of evangelical preachers, primarily in the U.S. It is currently owned by Salem Publications, a family of Christian media companies. 3) The
Austin American-Statesman is the major daily newspaper of Austin, the capital city of Texas, U.S. It has existed since 1871 (founded as the Democratic Statesman) and is now owned by Cox Enterprises. 4)
Baptist Press was formed in 1946 by the Southern Baptist Convention as a news source of interest to Southern Baptists and Christians with common interests. 5) SEC filings. Not sure of Wikipedia's policy regarding reliability, but these filings are one of the few sources where you can actually go to jail for including falsehoods. -
Hudson Bender (
talk)
20:00, 14 January 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. I have added 3 independent citations, and consider that notability is now demonstrated. I have therefore removed the Notability banner, as well as Advert which IMHO is no longer required either. –
FayenaticLondon12:35, 2 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Weak Keep, covering in
Baptist Press might be considered reliable and substantial enough to push this over the
WP:GNG. Not sure about the credibility of "Christian Computing Magazine". Some of the sources are blogs and need to be looked at carefully.
Lankiveil(
speak to me)12:05, 14 January 2014 (UTC).reply
Keep. 1) Christian Computing Magazine has existed in print and online since 1989. It has been one of the main sources of news about the software industry serving Christian churches, primarily evangelical and U.S. 2) Preaching Magazine has existed in print and online for over 20 years serving the audience of evangelical preachers, primarily in the U.S. It is currently owned by Salem Publications, a family of Christian media companies. 3) The
Austin American-Statesman is the major daily newspaper of Austin, the capital city of Texas, U.S. It has existed since 1871 (founded as the Democratic Statesman) and is now owned by Cox Enterprises. 4)
Baptist Press was formed in 1946 by the Southern Baptist Convention as a news source of interest to Southern Baptists and Christians with common interests. 5) SEC filings. Not sure of Wikipedia's policy regarding reliability, but these filings are one of the few sources where you can actually go to jail for including falsehoods. -
Hudson Bender (
talk)
20:00, 14 January 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.