- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mz7 ( talk) 21:13, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Vulva Original
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vulva Original ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:PRODUCT. Passing mentions are common but there aren't and in-depth reviews which suggest it's notable. StraussInTheHouse ( talk) 12:57, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion per CSD G11, blatant promotionDelete. The only source is to a web-shop selling it, a company that is getting free promotion here, so how this "article" has survived a prior AfD-discussion, and managed to stay up for many years, totally beats me... - Tom | Thomas.W talk 13:19, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy deletion was declined, so let's finish it off here... - Tom | Thomas.W talk 09:11, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Pure Promo, no notability shown. - Roxy, the Prod. wooF 19:49, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, pure advertising, the single footnote goes to an ad. Bishonen | talk 03:41, 17 November 2018 (UTC).
- Delete Wikipedia is not a platform to advertise products. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:35, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Promo. Fails GNG. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 08:01, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mz7 ( talk) 21:13, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Vulva Original
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vulva Original ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:PRODUCT. Passing mentions are common but there aren't and in-depth reviews which suggest it's notable. StraussInTheHouse ( talk) 12:57, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion per CSD G11, blatant promotionDelete. The only source is to a web-shop selling it, a company that is getting free promotion here, so how this "article" has survived a prior AfD-discussion, and managed to stay up for many years, totally beats me... - Tom | Thomas.W talk 13:19, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy deletion was declined, so let's finish it off here... - Tom | Thomas.W talk 09:11, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Pure Promo, no notability shown. - Roxy, the Prod. wooF 19:49, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, pure advertising, the single footnote goes to an ad. Bishonen | talk 03:41, 17 November 2018 (UTC).
- Delete Wikipedia is not a platform to advertise products. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:35, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Promo. Fails GNG. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 08:01, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.