- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus was the subject passes WP:NALBUM (non-admin closure) Rollidan ( talk) 21:23, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Voyage à Paris
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Voyage à Paris ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails all of the criteria of WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings. -- Softlavender ( talk) 20:28, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:31, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, meets WP:NALBUM, there are four independent reviews (or 3 if editors want to count the Gramophone reviews of 1995 and 2016 as one) of this album that are included in the article. Coolabahapple ( talk) 11:20, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NALBUM. The article's COPYVIO issue has now been addressed - brief review excerpts will be supplied in due course. Opera Now, March 1995, p. 67 has a further review. Niggle1892 ( talk) 17:27, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus was the subject passes WP:NALBUM (non-admin closure) Rollidan ( talk) 21:23, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Voyage à Paris
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Voyage à Paris ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails all of the criteria of WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings. -- Softlavender ( talk) 20:28, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:31, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, meets WP:NALBUM, there are four independent reviews (or 3 if editors want to count the Gramophone reviews of 1995 and 2016 as one) of this album that are included in the article. Coolabahapple ( talk) 11:20, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NALBUM. The article's COPYVIO issue has now been addressed - brief review excerpts will be supplied in due course. Opera Now, March 1995, p. 67 has a further review. Niggle1892 ( talk) 17:27, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.