The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 11:47, 4 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD, no rationale left. PROD reason was " Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. All that's in the article is pure promotional fluff." Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:44, 28 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Improve I believe that this article should not be deleted whatsoever. If we worked together, we could publish an amazing entry is a matter of an hour or two. The company is relevant, but the content needs to be revamped. This article needs to not be deleted, and instead it needs to be improved and restored. Coolboygcp ( talk) 11:36, 2 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 11:47, 4 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD, no rationale left. PROD reason was " Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. All that's in the article is pure promotional fluff." Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:44, 28 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Improve I believe that this article should not be deleted whatsoever. If we worked together, we could publish an amazing entry is a matter of an hour or two. The company is relevant, but the content needs to be revamped. This article needs to not be deleted, and instead it needs to be improved and restored. Coolboygcp ( talk) 11:36, 2 April 2013 (UTC) reply