The result of the debate was delete both - Liberatore( T) 16:44, 19 May 2006 (UTC) reply
KayinRichards: Keep Wii60, delete Viva La Wii60- Wii60 is a relevant and notable term, as of E3 2006. This term has caught on like a viral campaign, that doesn't seem to be related to either company in any formal manner. Regardless, it has taken on a life of it's own, and this term is on every game forum on the net. It will be around for the foreseeable future, and normal console game cycle. I would say 5-6 years. My brother is 13, and kids in his school in Florida have been talking nonstop about the three consoles. Wii60 (he has told me) is a frequent term used amongst his friends, and kids who're unhappy with the new PS3's showing/price/forced blu-ray. I don't see any reason for the Wii60 article to be deleted; however, I do think that the Revolution one, is absurd, and has no business on Wikipedia.
Load of unencyclopedic randomcrapcruft and fancruft. Speedy contested by author, with comments on talk page. M1ss1ontomars2k4 04:24, 14 May 2006 (UTC) reply
So what should I do to improve it so that you guys don't delete it?
My spelling is fine...I'm gonna be editing this for a day or two so don't delete yet... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justicemanjj15 ( talk • contribs)
Oh, and if you enter "Viva La Wii60" into google or yahoo, you get many relevant links to all kinds of video game websites, besides Gamespot and Gamefaqs. That is pretty notable if you ask me.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Justicemanjj15 ( talk • contribs)
I rewrote it to be neutral, put in some links, put in a time-frame, related stuff shows up on google, but its still not good? The Wikipedia Notability page says that is has no official policy on it. Besides this is not fiction either. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Justicemanjj15 ( talk • contribs) .
I just put in tons of links, showing that this is all across the internet. The Washington Post wrote an article about the agreement. I hope that convinces you guys that this is "notable".
Whatever. If you guys wanna delete it so badly go ahead. I was just trying to contribute. I thought it was interesting, and yes, notable. I did all I could to try to make it meet your standards, but that is easier said than done. What if I were to write another article about the informal alliance between Microsoft and Nintendo in general, minus the revolutionist stuff? Seeing as I have so many links to back that up as notable, would you guys challenge it too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justicemanjj15 ( talk • contribs)
Look at link number 4. Hopefully that will save me. If not, o well.
I think what I will do is redo this article under the name "Wii60", leaving out the Revolutionist stuff and keeping it focused on the informal alliance between the two corporations.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Justicemanjj15 ( talk • contribs)
19:16, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Yes it was.
there is already an article called Wii60. Maybe we could merge the two articles.
they are merged. Now what?
Separate the Wii60 and Viva la Wii60 AfD. While Viva La Wii60 is more POV and terrible, Wii60 is a better article. Unglue the two AFDs. And besides, you didn't change the page. Just the header.
I agree. We should scrap the Viva La Wii60 page and focus on the actual Wii60 page.
The result of the debate was delete both - Liberatore( T) 16:44, 19 May 2006 (UTC) reply
KayinRichards: Keep Wii60, delete Viva La Wii60- Wii60 is a relevant and notable term, as of E3 2006. This term has caught on like a viral campaign, that doesn't seem to be related to either company in any formal manner. Regardless, it has taken on a life of it's own, and this term is on every game forum on the net. It will be around for the foreseeable future, and normal console game cycle. I would say 5-6 years. My brother is 13, and kids in his school in Florida have been talking nonstop about the three consoles. Wii60 (he has told me) is a frequent term used amongst his friends, and kids who're unhappy with the new PS3's showing/price/forced blu-ray. I don't see any reason for the Wii60 article to be deleted; however, I do think that the Revolution one, is absurd, and has no business on Wikipedia.
Load of unencyclopedic randomcrapcruft and fancruft. Speedy contested by author, with comments on talk page. M1ss1ontomars2k4 04:24, 14 May 2006 (UTC) reply
So what should I do to improve it so that you guys don't delete it?
My spelling is fine...I'm gonna be editing this for a day or two so don't delete yet... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justicemanjj15 ( talk • contribs)
Oh, and if you enter "Viva La Wii60" into google or yahoo, you get many relevant links to all kinds of video game websites, besides Gamespot and Gamefaqs. That is pretty notable if you ask me.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Justicemanjj15 ( talk • contribs)
I rewrote it to be neutral, put in some links, put in a time-frame, related stuff shows up on google, but its still not good? The Wikipedia Notability page says that is has no official policy on it. Besides this is not fiction either. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Justicemanjj15 ( talk • contribs) .
I just put in tons of links, showing that this is all across the internet. The Washington Post wrote an article about the agreement. I hope that convinces you guys that this is "notable".
Whatever. If you guys wanna delete it so badly go ahead. I was just trying to contribute. I thought it was interesting, and yes, notable. I did all I could to try to make it meet your standards, but that is easier said than done. What if I were to write another article about the informal alliance between Microsoft and Nintendo in general, minus the revolutionist stuff? Seeing as I have so many links to back that up as notable, would you guys challenge it too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justicemanjj15 ( talk • contribs)
Look at link number 4. Hopefully that will save me. If not, o well.
I think what I will do is redo this article under the name "Wii60", leaving out the Revolutionist stuff and keeping it focused on the informal alliance between the two corporations.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Justicemanjj15 ( talk • contribs)
19:16, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Yes it was.
there is already an article called Wii60. Maybe we could merge the two articles.
they are merged. Now what?
Separate the Wii60 and Viva la Wii60 AfD. While Viva La Wii60 is more POV and terrible, Wii60 is a better article. Unglue the two AFDs. And besides, you didn't change the page. Just the header.
I agree. We should scrap the Viva La Wii60 page and focus on the actual Wii60 page.