The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 03:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC) reply
OR. "Visual writing" is a neologism at best; and even as a neologism, that term is not a term that is used to describe the topic of the article. The references don't use the term "visual writing". The article's haphazard definition of "visual writing" would also encompass childrens' picture books, for example. Comet Tuttle ( talk) 21:32, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 03:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC) reply
OR. "Visual writing" is a neologism at best; and even as a neologism, that term is not a term that is used to describe the topic of the article. The references don't use the term "visual writing". The article's haphazard definition of "visual writing" would also encompass childrens' picture books, for example. Comet Tuttle ( talk) 21:32, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply