The result was delete due to lack of reliable sources and possible conflicts of interest. -- Selket Talk 21:43, 26 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Soon-to-be-released kids' virtual world (apparently a knock-off of another soon-to-be-closed one). No third party sources, fails WP:WEB miserably. I smell spam. Vary | Talk 13:46, 18 May 2008 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
OpposeThis is not spam! the Virtual family Kingdom is an attempt by former VMK players (like me) to establish a new safe haven to replace the one that they will be losing on Wednesday. It's just that the article is not written properly (more like an ad). What I think needs to be done, is that the article should be left alone until Thursday the 22nd (game opening day), so someone can actually see what the game is about. And, yes, the article is significant, because as I said before, it is an event that happened as a result of the closing of a widely popular game. I will make a few changes, then I think that it should be left dormant until the 22nd.-- Listen to your Princess, dear Wikipedians. ( talk) 20:10, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose I notice, for one, the nom seems more than a little biased. And I also oppose per Princess Janay. K C 109 21:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC). reply
Awesome. Thanks, Vary. I made a few changes to the article already.-- Listen to your Princess, dear Wikipedians. ( talk) 01:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Are you people just not understanding what I'm saying? The game is new. In fact, it was made very, very recently. It is so new, that gaming magazines haven't caught wind of it yet. Can't you guys use the sources already there, and wait until the internet provides more sources?-- Listen to your Princess, dear Wikipedians. ( talk) 23:13, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
You know what? Delete it. But, I will just rewrite it with more sources. I'm going to have to scout out some sources over the internet.-- Listen to your Princess, dear Wikipedians. ( talk) 13:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete due to lack of reliable sources and possible conflicts of interest. -- Selket Talk 21:43, 26 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Soon-to-be-released kids' virtual world (apparently a knock-off of another soon-to-be-closed one). No third party sources, fails WP:WEB miserably. I smell spam. Vary | Talk 13:46, 18 May 2008 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
OpposeThis is not spam! the Virtual family Kingdom is an attempt by former VMK players (like me) to establish a new safe haven to replace the one that they will be losing on Wednesday. It's just that the article is not written properly (more like an ad). What I think needs to be done, is that the article should be left alone until Thursday the 22nd (game opening day), so someone can actually see what the game is about. And, yes, the article is significant, because as I said before, it is an event that happened as a result of the closing of a widely popular game. I will make a few changes, then I think that it should be left dormant until the 22nd.-- Listen to your Princess, dear Wikipedians. ( talk) 20:10, 19 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose I notice, for one, the nom seems more than a little biased. And I also oppose per Princess Janay. K C 109 21:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC). reply
Awesome. Thanks, Vary. I made a few changes to the article already.-- Listen to your Princess, dear Wikipedians. ( talk) 01:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Are you people just not understanding what I'm saying? The game is new. In fact, it was made very, very recently. It is so new, that gaming magazines haven't caught wind of it yet. Can't you guys use the sources already there, and wait until the internet provides more sources?-- Listen to your Princess, dear Wikipedians. ( talk) 23:13, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
You know what? Delete it. But, I will just rewrite it with more sources. I'm going to have to scout out some sources over the internet.-- Listen to your Princess, dear Wikipedians. ( talk) 13:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC) reply