The result was Delete. — Wknight94 ( talk) 16:08, 5 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Seemingly non-notable British BDSM club, article hasn't been really touched in over half a year. Proposed for deletion contested, with the argument:
So what? If compared to SMFR (which was deleted), it is found on Google among the first hits, the external link connected to the club's official site, and the club organises events every month or every two months. Still the article was deleted. The only thing that makes Violate more notable than SMFR is its involvement in Scottish politics. I vote delete. JIP | Talk 16:38, 20 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Don't know if that's good enough. AnonEMouse (squeak) 14:12, 27 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. — Wknight94 ( talk) 16:08, 5 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Seemingly non-notable British BDSM club, article hasn't been really touched in over half a year. Proposed for deletion contested, with the argument:
So what? If compared to SMFR (which was deleted), it is found on Google among the first hits, the external link connected to the club's official site, and the club organises events every month or every two months. Still the article was deleted. The only thing that makes Violate more notable than SMFR is its involvement in Scottish politics. I vote delete. JIP | Talk 16:38, 20 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Don't know if that's good enough. AnonEMouse (squeak) 14:12, 27 October 2006 (UTC) reply