- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GSS ( talk) 17:34, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Vijai Sardesai ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Reasoning by Mr. Guye was "Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Also promotional." I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 21:47, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 21:47, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 21:47, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as an MLA (Assembly Member) is enough for WP:POLITICIAN. SwisterTwister talk 21:49, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Meets WP:NPOL as someone having held "national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office" and a "member or former member of a national, state or provincial legislature" AusLondonder ( talk) 05:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- While the WP:CIRCULAR referencing to other Wikipedia articles certainly had to be stripped, other sources are present in the article besides that — and a promotional tone can be cleaned up through the normal editing process. But duly elected members of state legislatures do pass WP:NPOL #1 as long as their status as members can be properly verified. Keep and flag for cleanup; I've already stripped the circular references. Bearcat ( talk) 16:54, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GSS ( talk) 17:34, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Vijai Sardesai ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Reasoning by Mr. Guye was "Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Also promotional." I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 21:47, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 21:47, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses ( My talk page) ( My edits) @ 21:47, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as an MLA (Assembly Member) is enough for WP:POLITICIAN. SwisterTwister talk 21:49, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Meets WP:NPOL as someone having held "national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office" and a "member or former member of a national, state or provincial legislature" AusLondonder ( talk) 05:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- While the WP:CIRCULAR referencing to other Wikipedia articles certainly had to be stripped, other sources are present in the article besides that — and a promotional tone can be cleaned up through the normal editing process. But duly elected members of state legislatures do pass WP:NPOL #1 as long as their status as members can be properly verified. Keep and flag for cleanup; I've already stripped the circular references. Bearcat ( talk) 16:54, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.