- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 14:50, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Vibrant Academy
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vibrant Academy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pathetic sources. Shockingly survived two nominations. Can find only passing mentions. No reliable, independent and in-depth coverage exists. COI editors have been involved in the past. Fails Wiki's notability guidelines. Article is being used to burnish the image of this "coaching factory", as an advertisement. MaysinFourty ( talk) 10:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 11:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 11:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 11:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete this is not a regular full curriculum school so it does not even fall under our now much questioned default acceptance of secondary schools, specialized schools like this need extensive sourcing, more than we have on the article. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - as per WP:NSCHOOL, schools are not inherently notable and need to pass WP:GNG; this school doesn't pass Spiderone 10:20, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 14:50, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Vibrant Academy
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vibrant Academy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pathetic sources. Shockingly survived two nominations. Can find only passing mentions. No reliable, independent and in-depth coverage exists. COI editors have been involved in the past. Fails Wiki's notability guidelines. Article is being used to burnish the image of this "coaching factory", as an advertisement. MaysinFourty ( talk) 10:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 11:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 11:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 11:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete this is not a regular full curriculum school so it does not even fall under our now much questioned default acceptance of secondary schools, specialized schools like this need extensive sourcing, more than we have on the article. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - as per WP:NSCHOOL, schools are not inherently notable and need to pass WP:GNG; this school doesn't pass Spiderone 10:20, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.