The result was keep and cleanup per discussion below. There does not seem to be a consensus within this debate to merge the article, but that avenue can be pursued through the normal methods. Non-admin close. -- jonny- m t 07:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
No references, other than dictionaries. (As an aside, those should not be in the "references" section, even if they were references.) No sources. No articles about the subject. Nothing. Perhaps it should be transwikied to Wiktionary, but I don't know if non-notable phrases are wanted there, either. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 02:52, 19 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep and cleanup per discussion below. There does not seem to be a consensus within this debate to merge the article, but that avenue can be pursued through the normal methods. Non-admin close. -- jonny- m t 07:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
No references, other than dictionaries. (As an aside, those should not be in the "references" section, even if they were references.) No sources. No articles about the subject. Nothing. Perhaps it should be transwikied to Wiktionary, but I don't know if non-notable phrases are wanted there, either. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 02:52, 19 February 2008 (UTC) reply