The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete I would have speedied it since except for the lede it's 100% copyvio directly from the website. No appearance of notability, blatantly promo.
JamesG5 (
talk)
10:12, 24 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep.
Pn tham has revised to eliminate copyvio and promotional language, and I have done some minor cleanup of bare URLs and formatting issues. My !vote to keep, though, is based on understanding that approvals by national accreditation agencies and national technical councils, and official affiliation with
Anna University constitute significant, substantial, reliable, independent, verifiable secondary sources. The "passing mentions" represent a rigorous process of ensuring quality of a college's programs, faculty, accountability, and support for students' education. That, and inherent difficulties finding indexed publications for international sources, lead me to rely upon evidence of regional accrediting and technical councils as sufficient for notability. Cheers! —
Grand'mere Eugene (
talk)
19:21, 25 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete unless reliable coverage can be found in independent sources, I'm not finding it. I don't accept the argument that accreditation creates an independent source. Schools are not exempt from GNG. buidhe00:43, 3 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete I would have speedied it since except for the lede it's 100% copyvio directly from the website. No appearance of notability, blatantly promo.
JamesG5 (
talk)
10:12, 24 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep.
Pn tham has revised to eliminate copyvio and promotional language, and I have done some minor cleanup of bare URLs and formatting issues. My !vote to keep, though, is based on understanding that approvals by national accreditation agencies and national technical councils, and official affiliation with
Anna University constitute significant, substantial, reliable, independent, verifiable secondary sources. The "passing mentions" represent a rigorous process of ensuring quality of a college's programs, faculty, accountability, and support for students' education. That, and inherent difficulties finding indexed publications for international sources, lead me to rely upon evidence of regional accrediting and technical councils as sufficient for notability. Cheers! —
Grand'mere Eugene (
talk)
19:21, 25 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete unless reliable coverage can be found in independent sources, I'm not finding it. I don't accept the argument that accreditation creates an independent source. Schools are not exempt from GNG. buidhe00:43, 3 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.