- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to UFO sightings in France. Spinning Spark 18:14, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Valensole UFO incident
- Valensole UFO incident ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No WP:FRIND sources available to establish notability. jps ( talk) 13:56, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:19, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:19, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:19, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Keep, better sources now added.Victão Lopes Fala! 17:14, 12 July 2014 (UTC)- Changing my vote to merge and redirect to UFO sightings in France#1965 given the below comments, sounds fair enough. However, I'd like to point out that LuckyLouie should refrain from removing sourced information simply by judging its name. I appreciate you taking your time to find better sources and copy editing, though. Good job. Victão Lopes Fala! 20:35, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Sources such as a page from a TV entertainment website entitled "Paranormal Science" aren't suitable. I've found more appropriate academic sources and copyedited accordingly. - LuckyLouie ( talk) 15:07, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment A pretty old article; but is this incident notable enough to deserve a standalone place. Although there are coverages in seemingly academic sources, these kind of solitary/sole experiences need more, such as an implant or a captured alien artefact. To be sufficiently notable, should have made a lot of noise, like Roswell for instance. French wikipedia and List of UFO sightings coverages look adequate. Logos5557 ( talk) 23:48, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- To the closing user/admin In case the decision/consensus is delete, you might consider merging the summarized version into the List of UFO sightings, turning the page into redirect (to the list of ufo sightings) and protecting (to prevent recreation). Logos5557 ( talk) 21:25, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 15:33, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to UFO sightings in France#1965. Well summarized by Victão Lopes.-- Rpclod ( talk) 14:51, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to UFO sightings in France. Spinning Spark 18:14, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Valensole UFO incident
- Valensole UFO incident ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No WP:FRIND sources available to establish notability. jps ( talk) 13:56, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:19, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:19, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:19, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Keep, better sources now added.Victão Lopes Fala! 17:14, 12 July 2014 (UTC)- Changing my vote to merge and redirect to UFO sightings in France#1965 given the below comments, sounds fair enough. However, I'd like to point out that LuckyLouie should refrain from removing sourced information simply by judging its name. I appreciate you taking your time to find better sources and copy editing, though. Good job. Victão Lopes Fala! 20:35, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Sources such as a page from a TV entertainment website entitled "Paranormal Science" aren't suitable. I've found more appropriate academic sources and copyedited accordingly. - LuckyLouie ( talk) 15:07, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment A pretty old article; but is this incident notable enough to deserve a standalone place. Although there are coverages in seemingly academic sources, these kind of solitary/sole experiences need more, such as an implant or a captured alien artefact. To be sufficiently notable, should have made a lot of noise, like Roswell for instance. French wikipedia and List of UFO sightings coverages look adequate. Logos5557 ( talk) 23:48, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- To the closing user/admin In case the decision/consensus is delete, you might consider merging the summarized version into the List of UFO sightings, turning the page into redirect (to the list of ufo sightings) and protecting (to prevent recreation). Logos5557 ( talk) 21:25, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 15:33, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to UFO sightings in France#1965. Well summarized by Victão Lopes.-- Rpclod ( talk) 14:51, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.