- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 14:40, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- VAT Refund Eligibility Table for EU based Companies ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not encyclopedic, not referenced, not reliable compilation of tax rates. Do not quite understand the purpose of this. The article itself says The table below is intended as a guide only. Renata ( talk) 01:48, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree that this is not appropriate for a standalone article per WP:NOTGUIDE, and it is somewhat duplicative of the information at Value-added tax#European Union countries, though the table in this article includes much more detail. Jakegreenblatt, as the creator of this article, please understand that we are not criticizing you as an editor; you clearly have a strong enthusiasm for creating content for this encyclopedia, and I hope that you will continue to contribute here. Perhaps you can help improve the article for Value-added tax by adding citations to reliable sources? Best, -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 20:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT and unreferenced WP:OR. Not something one would expect to find in an encyclopedia. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:01, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 14:40, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- VAT Refund Eligibility Table for EU based Companies ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not encyclopedic, not referenced, not reliable compilation of tax rates. Do not quite understand the purpose of this. The article itself says The table below is intended as a guide only. Renata ( talk) 01:48, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree that this is not appropriate for a standalone article per WP:NOTGUIDE, and it is somewhat duplicative of the information at Value-added tax#European Union countries, though the table in this article includes much more detail. Jakegreenblatt, as the creator of this article, please understand that we are not criticizing you as an editor; you clearly have a strong enthusiasm for creating content for this encyclopedia, and I hope that you will continue to contribute here. Perhaps you can help improve the article for Value-added tax by adding citations to reliable sources? Best, -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 20:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT and unreferenced WP:OR. Not something one would expect to find in an encyclopedia. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:01, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.