- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ute, Nevada ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Found in CAT:NN cleanup. Agree with Cxbrx who placed the notability tag: between the topographic maps and WP:BEFORE, this seems to have been a railroad siding and crossing, not a community. Coverage is pretty trivial, and without a community at the site, WP:GEOLAND is not met. Hog Farm Talk 15:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Talk 15:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Talk 15:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- I'd suggest turning it inside-out and making it about the Tiffany Minerals Company of Moapa, except that I cannot find that documented in depth. As I suspect already noted by Cxbrx, all of the sources are really about the geology (and not the geology of the railway either) and this stuff is largely a collection of asides. I went looking and turned up much the same stuff and no more. Uncle G ( talk) 20:48, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- delete There are some foundations consistent with some sort of industrial operation there, but topos show a passing siding (which is still there), and that appears to have been the rail point's primary purpose. At any rate, not a settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 21:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- delete As per my comments in the talk pages: "Ute is probably not notable. It appears that there was a mill there, but there is no evidence of anyone living at that location. https://newspapers.com did not come up with much. Google books has a few references that refer to the siding. WP:STATION applies, so lacking multiple non-trivial sources, Ute is probably not notable." Cxbrx ( talk) 22:08, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. No good sources, was never an actual settlement, and a mining company having a brief presence in the area doesn't mean much. AdoTang ( talk) 14:34, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ute, Nevada ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Found in CAT:NN cleanup. Agree with Cxbrx who placed the notability tag: between the topographic maps and WP:BEFORE, this seems to have been a railroad siding and crossing, not a community. Coverage is pretty trivial, and without a community at the site, WP:GEOLAND is not met. Hog Farm Talk 15:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Talk 15:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Talk 15:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- I'd suggest turning it inside-out and making it about the Tiffany Minerals Company of Moapa, except that I cannot find that documented in depth. As I suspect already noted by Cxbrx, all of the sources are really about the geology (and not the geology of the railway either) and this stuff is largely a collection of asides. I went looking and turned up much the same stuff and no more. Uncle G ( talk) 20:48, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- delete There are some foundations consistent with some sort of industrial operation there, but topos show a passing siding (which is still there), and that appears to have been the rail point's primary purpose. At any rate, not a settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 21:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- delete As per my comments in the talk pages: "Ute is probably not notable. It appears that there was a mill there, but there is no evidence of anyone living at that location. https://newspapers.com did not come up with much. Google books has a few references that refer to the siding. WP:STATION applies, so lacking multiple non-trivial sources, Ute is probably not notable." Cxbrx ( talk) 22:08, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. No good sources, was never an actual settlement, and a mining company having a brief presence in the area doesn't mean much. AdoTang ( talk) 14:34, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.