The result was keep. The nominator withdrew their nomination, and the consensus here is for the article to be retained. It appears that the sole delete !voter's concerns have been addressed per recent editing that has occurred to the article. ( Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000 (talk) 09:47, 18 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Minor architectural practice. Two claims to fame don't appear to be supported by the reference provided.
Stuartyeates (
talk)
20:30, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
reply
Withdraw All my concerns addressed by recent edits by AllyD and Sionk. Stuartyeates ( talk) 21:16, 17 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. The nominator withdrew their nomination, and the consensus here is for the article to be retained. It appears that the sole delete !voter's concerns have been addressed per recent editing that has occurred to the article. ( Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000 (talk) 09:47, 18 June 2012 (UTC) reply
Minor architectural practice. Two claims to fame don't appear to be supported by the reference provided.
Stuartyeates (
talk)
20:30, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
reply
Withdraw All my concerns addressed by recent edits by AllyD and Sionk. Stuartyeates ( talk) 21:16, 17 June 2012 (UTC) reply