The result was keep. and improve Ronhjones (Talk) 01:52, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
I'm sure I'm opening a can of worms with this one but this article is a total mess. Its biggest problem is it vastly violates WP:NOTGUIDE. Beyond that, if you follow its history, its been a dumping ground for spam links. Short of a total rewrite, I don't think this "article" works as a wikipedia entry as its not really encyclopedic at all. — ASPENSTI— TALK— CONTRIBUTIONS 04:11, 12 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. and improve Ronhjones (Talk) 01:52, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply
I'm sure I'm opening a can of worms with this one but this article is a total mess. Its biggest problem is it vastly violates WP:NOTGUIDE. Beyond that, if you follow its history, its been a dumping ground for spam links. Short of a total rewrite, I don't think this "article" works as a wikipedia entry as its not really encyclopedic at all. — ASPENSTI— TALK— CONTRIBUTIONS 04:11, 12 December 2009 (UTC) reply