The result was delete. Keeper | 76 02:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Listcruft. The list was previously nominated in 2006 (also see this one and this one), with a decision to keep based on the assumption that people would find references for these supposed problems. However, in the last 3 years, no references have been found and the list has accumulated even more silliness than it began with.
Some of the things in the list are complete nonsense ("How much time is needed by the brain to comprehend its insufficiency?"), some are obvious non-problems ("What is death?" it's when you stop living), and the rest are either POV or OR.
It seems to me that this article is not likely to be improved any time soon (based on its track record since the last AfD nomination) and would be better off not existing until someone has actual, sourced, verifiable information to add to it. Arthree ( talk) 15:27, 5 June 2009 (UTC) reply
It's agreed that the article as it stands is hopeless. However, I would just note that there do exist sources for an article with this title.— S Marshall Talk/ Cont 23:56, 8 June 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Keeper | 76 02:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Listcruft. The list was previously nominated in 2006 (also see this one and this one), with a decision to keep based on the assumption that people would find references for these supposed problems. However, in the last 3 years, no references have been found and the list has accumulated even more silliness than it began with.
Some of the things in the list are complete nonsense ("How much time is needed by the brain to comprehend its insufficiency?"), some are obvious non-problems ("What is death?" it's when you stop living), and the rest are either POV or OR.
It seems to me that this article is not likely to be improved any time soon (based on its track record since the last AfD nomination) and would be better off not existing until someone has actual, sourced, verifiable information to add to it. Arthree ( talk) 15:27, 5 June 2009 (UTC) reply
It's agreed that the article as it stands is hopeless. However, I would just note that there do exist sources for an article with this title.— S Marshall Talk/ Cont 23:56, 8 June 2009 (UTC) reply