- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep for now it seems (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 05:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Universal Life Church Monastery
- Universal Life Church Monastery ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable offshoot of the Universal Life Church. Fails WP:ORG. Delete. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 18:09, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - Appears quite sufficiently sourced OP replaced the "speedy tag" twice ( [1], [2]) making an assumption that only an admin can decline a speedy. Sufficient sourcing currently, and apparently has sufficient rights to the name. Toledo Blade and other news articles establish this as a distinct and therefore notable variant of the original ULC. [3] and [4] mentioned by the NYT as a distinct entity from the ULC in two separate articles. Collect ( talk) 19:11, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Here's a working copy of that Toledo Blade link. I'm not sure how merely establishing something as distinct makes it notable, and those New York Times pieces you link to are just passing mentions, and are the sort of incidental coverage that does not establish notability per WP:GROUP. -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 21:40, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:00, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:00, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:00, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep – Clearly meets notability and sourcing for WP:ORG.-- ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:03, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - For reasons already given above. TechBear | Talk | Contributions 01:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Sufficiently notable as a separate entity from Universal Life Church. Ivanvector 🍁 ( talk) 18:08, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep for now it seems (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 05:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Universal Life Church Monastery
- Universal Life Church Monastery ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable offshoot of the Universal Life Church. Fails WP:ORG. Delete. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 18:09, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - Appears quite sufficiently sourced OP replaced the "speedy tag" twice ( [1], [2]) making an assumption that only an admin can decline a speedy. Sufficient sourcing currently, and apparently has sufficient rights to the name. Toledo Blade and other news articles establish this as a distinct and therefore notable variant of the original ULC. [3] and [4] mentioned by the NYT as a distinct entity from the ULC in two separate articles. Collect ( talk) 19:11, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Here's a working copy of that Toledo Blade link. I'm not sure how merely establishing something as distinct makes it notable, and those New York Times pieces you link to are just passing mentions, and are the sort of incidental coverage that does not establish notability per WP:GROUP. -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 21:40, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:00, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:00, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:00, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep – Clearly meets notability and sourcing for WP:ORG.-- ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:03, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - For reasons already given above. TechBear | Talk | Contributions 01:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Sufficiently notable as a separate entity from Universal Life Church. Ivanvector 🍁 ( talk) 18:08, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.