The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete The article is all about
SpongeBob SquarePants. A mention of the production company could be added to the main article but there's nothing in here to justify a stand alone article and searches don't find anything significant that's not related to SpongeBob..
Neiltonks (
talk) 13:50, 30 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep I'm always uncomfortable with these type of nominations that are filed days after an associated subject dies. The sourcing here is not problematic in the least and it looks like an average production company article. Nate•(
chatter) 05:59, 1 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Mrschimpf, the article wasn't notable even prior to Hillenburg's death, but we can be pretty much certain that it will stay unnotable. The sourcing here is problematic because the only source used for information about the subject is an extract from California's SoS to source the incorporation date of the company. We do not even have any source saying that Hillenburg founded the company (that's just trainspotting).
Lordtobi (
✉) 15:13, 2 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep as the article already has references that show significant coverage in multiple reliable sources and therefore passes
WP:GNG, regards
Atlantic306 (
talk) 15:00, 2 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Atlantic306, where do you see significant coverage? There is one database entry for the incorporation date, and the other sources justify list entries. Exactly zero sources discuss the topic itself in any way. This is not significant coverage. For full disclosure, the article formerly hosted one additional sentence about the United Plankton Charitable Trust, which was also founded by Hillenburg but is unconnected to the production company; the sentence has since been removed.
Lordtobi (
✉) 15:11, 2 December 2018 (UTC)reply
It is significant coverage of the company's products but more coverage of the workings of the company would be good
Atlantic306 (
talk) 15:43, 2 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Atlantic306, exactly, but there is no such coverage out there (otherwise I would have long added it), which is why it failsWP:GNG. Good coverage of its products as means of keeping this article is inherited notability,
which does not exist.
Lordtobi (
✉) 15:45, 2 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:31, 7 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete.
WP:DIRECTORY, and as it stands the article is just a directory and appears unlikely to be possible to advance beyond that.
NoCOBOL (
talk) 16:04, 7 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge to (probably)
Stephen Hillenburg. There is little information here that is not already in the articles about Stephen Hillenburg and SpongeBob SquarePants - the exact date of incorporation is probably the main new information. There is one reference which is not included in either of the main articles, which is actually not about the production company but about the charity which shares its name, the United Plankton Charitable Trust - it would be good to include info about that in the Hillenburg article.
RebeccaGreen (
talk) 11:20, 8 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge and redirect to
Stephen Hillenburg - The article itself is limited in new information, but new information is there.
AwesumIndustrys (
talk) 14:33, 11 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete References fail the criteria for establishing notability. Merge any relevant info to
Stephen Hillenburg HighKing++ 16:15, 15 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Stephen Hillenburg. A functional
WP:ATD-M that could improve the suggested merge target article a bit. This title is also a likely search term; see
WP:ATD-R for more information. North America1000 23:16, 15 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Redirect or merge to
Stephen Hillenburg. It's a likely search term, although it offers very little information which is already provided by other articles especially the target. —
Mediran[talk] 14:10, 16 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete The article is all about
SpongeBob SquarePants. A mention of the production company could be added to the main article but there's nothing in here to justify a stand alone article and searches don't find anything significant that's not related to SpongeBob..
Neiltonks (
talk) 13:50, 30 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep I'm always uncomfortable with these type of nominations that are filed days after an associated subject dies. The sourcing here is not problematic in the least and it looks like an average production company article. Nate•(
chatter) 05:59, 1 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Mrschimpf, the article wasn't notable even prior to Hillenburg's death, but we can be pretty much certain that it will stay unnotable. The sourcing here is problematic because the only source used for information about the subject is an extract from California's SoS to source the incorporation date of the company. We do not even have any source saying that Hillenburg founded the company (that's just trainspotting).
Lordtobi (
✉) 15:13, 2 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep as the article already has references that show significant coverage in multiple reliable sources and therefore passes
WP:GNG, regards
Atlantic306 (
talk) 15:00, 2 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Atlantic306, where do you see significant coverage? There is one database entry for the incorporation date, and the other sources justify list entries. Exactly zero sources discuss the topic itself in any way. This is not significant coverage. For full disclosure, the article formerly hosted one additional sentence about the United Plankton Charitable Trust, which was also founded by Hillenburg but is unconnected to the production company; the sentence has since been removed.
Lordtobi (
✉) 15:11, 2 December 2018 (UTC)reply
It is significant coverage of the company's products but more coverage of the workings of the company would be good
Atlantic306 (
talk) 15:43, 2 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Atlantic306, exactly, but there is no such coverage out there (otherwise I would have long added it), which is why it failsWP:GNG. Good coverage of its products as means of keeping this article is inherited notability,
which does not exist.
Lordtobi (
✉) 15:45, 2 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:31, 7 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete.
WP:DIRECTORY, and as it stands the article is just a directory and appears unlikely to be possible to advance beyond that.
NoCOBOL (
talk) 16:04, 7 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge to (probably)
Stephen Hillenburg. There is little information here that is not already in the articles about Stephen Hillenburg and SpongeBob SquarePants - the exact date of incorporation is probably the main new information. There is one reference which is not included in either of the main articles, which is actually not about the production company but about the charity which shares its name, the United Plankton Charitable Trust - it would be good to include info about that in the Hillenburg article.
RebeccaGreen (
talk) 11:20, 8 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge and redirect to
Stephen Hillenburg - The article itself is limited in new information, but new information is there.
AwesumIndustrys (
talk) 14:33, 11 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete References fail the criteria for establishing notability. Merge any relevant info to
Stephen Hillenburg HighKing++ 16:15, 15 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Stephen Hillenburg. A functional
WP:ATD-M that could improve the suggested merge target article a bit. This title is also a likely search term; see
WP:ATD-R for more information. North America1000 23:16, 15 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Redirect or merge to
Stephen Hillenburg. It's a likely search term, although it offers very little information which is already provided by other articles especially the target. —
Mediran[talk] 14:10, 16 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.