- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NorthAmerica 1000 15:38, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Unison Agency
- Unison Agency ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Flagged as an advert for 5 years now. No search results in the leading trade magazine, PRWeek. Article is a mix of name-dropping, awards-spam and promotion, such as a description of how each tagline its ever had emphasized its strengths at the time. There are very few awards in the PR industry that genuinely impart notability, being that there are hundreds given out each year in this particular industry. CorporateM ( Talk) 00:57, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 00:58, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 00:58, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: no evidence of notability, promotional. BethNaught ( talk) 09:52, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti *Let's talk!* 04:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I see no evidence of notability, fails WP:ORG The only mentions in media that I could find were in reference to members (so and so, who works at Unison Agency). That doesn't count as media coverage. Trysha ( talk) 18:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NorthAmerica 1000 15:38, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Unison Agency
- Unison Agency ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Flagged as an advert for 5 years now. No search results in the leading trade magazine, PRWeek. Article is a mix of name-dropping, awards-spam and promotion, such as a description of how each tagline its ever had emphasized its strengths at the time. There are very few awards in the PR industry that genuinely impart notability, being that there are hundreds given out each year in this particular industry. CorporateM ( Talk) 00:57, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 00:58, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 00:58, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: no evidence of notability, promotional. BethNaught ( talk) 09:52, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti *Let's talk!* 04:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I see no evidence of notability, fails WP:ORG The only mentions in media that I could find were in reference to members (so and so, who works at Unison Agency). That doesn't count as media coverage. Trysha ( talk) 18:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.