The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep - being released is not a criteria for meeting the
WP:GNG. Sources like Rolling Stone cover it in pretty good detail. The article needs a complete rewrite (and probably a rename - if no other reason, because "album" shouldn't be capitalized) but the idea itself has enough coverage to meet the GNG.
Sergecross73msg me 19:09, 19 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep – The article meets the
general notability guideline, as it "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."
WP:NALBUMS, in talking about "unreleased material", doesn't seem to distinguish between albums that are planned for future release and those, like this one, that are not. But it says, "Unreleased material (including demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only recordings) is only notable if it has significant independent coverage in reliable sources." That is the case here. —
Mudwater (
Talk) 01:27, 20 January 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep - being released is not a criteria for meeting the
WP:GNG. Sources like Rolling Stone cover it in pretty good detail. The article needs a complete rewrite (and probably a rename - if no other reason, because "album" shouldn't be capitalized) but the idea itself has enough coverage to meet the GNG.
Sergecross73msg me 19:09, 19 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep – The article meets the
general notability guideline, as it "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."
WP:NALBUMS, in talking about "unreleased material", doesn't seem to distinguish between albums that are planned for future release and those, like this one, that are not. But it says, "Unreleased material (including demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only recordings) is only notable if it has significant independent coverage in reliable sources." That is the case here. —
Mudwater (
Talk) 01:27, 20 January 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.