The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:11, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
WP:BEFORE due diligence performed--I can't find anything significant at Google News or at Google Books. Most of the content I can find via Google appears to be minor, posted on blogs, the site's website, or obvious press releases [1] [2] that seem to say the exact same thing. This competition doesn't appear to have received significant coverage from reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. I think the subject is likely to be notable one day, but it is premature to include it at Wikipedia right now. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 23:01, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete per nom and WP:GNG/ WP:EVENT; searches do not seem to indicate any kind of coverage in any independent and secondary reliable sources. Further, the unsourced information that is on the page is not terribly encyclopedic, consisting mostly of non-contextualized competition trees and very little prose. Note that nominator made efforts to try to rescue this topic before recommending deletion (even reaching out to a WikiProject that might have additional resources), but the sources just don't seem to be there to make it happen. Snow talk 03:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:11, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
WP:BEFORE due diligence performed--I can't find anything significant at Google News or at Google Books. Most of the content I can find via Google appears to be minor, posted on blogs, the site's website, or obvious press releases [1] [2] that seem to say the exact same thing. This competition doesn't appear to have received significant coverage from reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. I think the subject is likely to be notable one day, but it is premature to include it at Wikipedia right now. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 23:01, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete per nom and WP:GNG/ WP:EVENT; searches do not seem to indicate any kind of coverage in any independent and secondary reliable sources. Further, the unsourced information that is on the page is not terribly encyclopedic, consisting mostly of non-contextualized competition trees and very little prose. Note that nominator made efforts to try to rescue this topic before recommending deletion (even reaching out to a WikiProject that might have additional resources), but the sources just don't seem to be there to make it happen. Snow talk 03:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)