From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:11, 25 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Undisputed World Bboy Series

Undisputed World Bboy Series (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BEFORE due diligence performed--I can't find anything significant at Google News or at Google Books. Most of the content I can find via Google appears to be minor, posted on blogs, the site's website, or obvious press releases [1] [2] that seem to say the exact same thing. This competition doesn't appear to have received significant coverage from reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. I think the subject is likely to be notable one day, but it is premature to include it at Wikipedia right now. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 23:01, 17 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Snow talk 03:35, 18 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Delete per nom and WP:GNG/ WP:EVENT; searches do not seem to indicate any kind of coverage in any independent and secondary reliable sources. Further, the unsourced information that is on the page is not terribly encyclopedic, consisting mostly of non-contextualized competition trees and very little prose. Note that nominator made efforts to try to rescue this topic before recommending deletion (even reaching out to a WikiProject that might have additional resources), but the sources just don't seem to be there to make it happen. Snow talk 03:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:05, 23 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - I conducted my own searches and come to the same conclusion as the nominator. -- Whpq ( talk) 19:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 01:11, 25 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Undisputed World Bboy Series

Undisputed World Bboy Series (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BEFORE due diligence performed--I can't find anything significant at Google News or at Google Books. Most of the content I can find via Google appears to be minor, posted on blogs, the site's website, or obvious press releases [1] [2] that seem to say the exact same thing. This competition doesn't appear to have received significant coverage from reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. I think the subject is likely to be notable one day, but it is premature to include it at Wikipedia right now. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 23:01, 17 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Snow talk 03:35, 18 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Delete per nom and WP:GNG/ WP:EVENT; searches do not seem to indicate any kind of coverage in any independent and secondary reliable sources. Further, the unsourced information that is on the page is not terribly encyclopedic, consisting mostly of non-contextualized competition trees and very little prose. Note that nominator made efforts to try to rescue this topic before recommending deletion (even reaching out to a WikiProject that might have additional resources), but the sources just don't seem to be there to make it happen. Snow talk 03:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:05, 23 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - I conducted my own searches and come to the same conclusion as the nominator. -- Whpq ( talk) 19:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook